Milk

harveymillk

Harvey Milk

Hilton Als on Milk and Harvey Milk at NYRB:

Milk received eight nominations for this year’s [Academy] awards; among them are [Gus] Van Sant for Best Director, [Dustin Lance] Black for his script, and [Sean] Penn for his impersonation of a man who did not find his true calling until he was forty-three years old. In the film, Milk doesn’t make much of a point about those lost years. “Forty years old and what have I done with my life?” he asks a new lover near the beginning. But the script is never explicit about what prevented him from living fully before 1973, the pivotal year in which he opened his camera store in the Castro. For a better sense of the painful secrecy Milk endured as a closeted gay man living in a pre-Stonewall world, and of the subsequent, purposeful freedom he felt during his belated coming-out, one can turn not only to Robert Epstein and Richard Schmiechen’s exceptional 1984 film, The Times of Harvey Milk (which won the Oscar for Best Documentary Feature in 1985), but to the bits of documentary footage Van Sant inserts into Milk‘s manufactured world.

Especially moving are the silent black-and-white images that make up the movie’s title sequence, in which well-groomed, thin, and for the most part white young men are rounded up in bars, cuffed, and arrested, while newspaper articles act as a kind of graphic voiceover: “Homosexuals and Police Clash”; “Tavern Charges Police Brutality”; “Police Start Crackdown on Homosexual Bars, Arrest 6.” These prefatory images, set apart from the main narrative, remain the film’s clearest statement of an essential fact: for most of his life, Milk lived in terror of arrest, interrogation, and punishment.  [more]

Obama “Disappoints” on Iraq Withdrawal

From Marc Lynch at Foreign Policy:

Iraq’s Parliamentary elections have not yet been scheduled and don’t even have an electoral law, and according to a number of senior Iraqi politicians probably will not be held until March 2010 (not December 2009).  That would then give the U.S. about five months to withdraw the bulk of the dozen combat brigades which would reportedly remain.  And then, keep in mind that U.S. officials generally agree (correctly) that the most dangerous period of elections is actually in their aftermath, when disgruntled losers might turn to violence or other destabilizing measures.  So the following month will likely not seem a good time either.  So that would leave four months to move, what — 9 brigades?  Did someone say precipitous?   Good luck with that. And that’s assuming, of course, that nothing else risky or destabilizing comes up in April or May 2010 (Kirkuk?) which would make a drawdown at that moment appear risky.  [more]

From Robert Dreyfuss at The Nation:

… it’s sad indeed to see the antiwar wing of the Democratic party disheartened by Obama’s Iraq policy, while the McCains of the world are cheering. This, truly, is change I can’t believe in.

From Anthony DiMaggio at counterpunch:

Despite the public’s long-standing opposition to the war and support for a short timetable for withdrawal, Obama and his generals continue to defy public wishes as they debate whether the occupation will continue for another three years, six years, or indefinitely into the future.  Much of the justification for this obstinacy is based on manipulation of available intelligence and from deceptively simplistic arguments that the 2007 troop surge “worked.”  Detailed analysis reveals that this deception is wide-ranging, as support for the surge spans across liberal and conservative mainstream media outlets. 

Google’s LIFE Photos

athurrothstein1

Arthur Rothstein

From Virginia Heffernan at IHT:

Go to the Google image-search page and you’ll see a link for the searchable Life material, which has been online for about four months. Images of Audrey Hepburn, Marilyn Monroe and an Apollo 11 astronaut advertise the holdings. Sounds like a happy place to pass an hour or two. But the home page for the archive has little charm, and the categories assigned to what are presumably the most exciting photographic subjects (“people,” “places,” 1860-1970 by decade) don’t exactly tantalize. Then, within these categories, you find some head-scratchers. Interested in “culture”? Here are photos of “railroad.” Drawn to “events”? You might like these shots of “World’s Fair,” “Academy Awards” or “Vietnam War.”

Captions, where they exist, vary widely in tone. Civil War photos come with newspaper-quality captions. A haunting Aug. 17, 1864, photo by A.J. Riddle is said to show “Inmates digging mass grave for their dead at Andersonville Prison during Civil War.” By contrast, a 1951 photo of a couple sitting under a tree is explained only as “Football Game, Football Players.” Almost all of the captions, like “young upcoming starlet Marilyn Monroe,” seem to be taken straight from the period, suggesting that Google saw no need to update or enrich them.

Most dispiriting of all is that Google doesn’t let viewers page through, photo by photo. The meditative slide-show rhythm – click, click, study, click, gaze, click, stare – is impossible to establish here. After looking at a photo you have to return to a page of thumbnails or a row of haphazardly related images and then select another to blow up. Though you’re permitted to search by size, content and color, the groupings of thumbnails still often lack rhyme and reason.

Read the whole thing here

QotD

Though the path has not been smooth, our economic system has worked extraordinarily well over time.  It has unleashed human potential as no other system has, and it will continue to do so. America’s best days lie ahead.

Warren Buffet

If Buffet means the human potential for greed and self-destruction he may be right.  It’s difficult to find a reason for optimism.  Perhaps it is this:  that the meltdown of the economy might provide an opportunity for change of a more profound kind than Barack Obama has in mind.