Trial of Omar Khadr

From Briarpatch:

The shaming of one Canadian has shamed all Canadians.”

-Liberal MP Paul Szabo, apologizing in the House of Commons for the RCMP’s treatment of lobbyist and arms dealer Karlheinz Schreiber. (Schreiber’s pants had fallen down while RCMP officers led him, in handcuffs, to a waiting cruiser after his testimony before the Commons Ethics Committee.)

 

You’re 15 years old, in the company of hardened militants who are associates of your father. A foreign army has invaded the country and unleashed a massive bombing campaign. Soldiers come knocking one morning and demand entry. The men around you refuse and a firefight ensues, culminating in the occupying air force bombarding the compound you’re in, killing everyone but you and one other person.

What happens next is disputed. As the soldiers enter the bombed-out compound a grenade is thrown and explodes near one of them. He later dies of his wounds. Based on witness reports, the thrower could have been one of three people: you, the man lying beside you, or a U.S. soldier outside the compound wall.

The man beside you is shot by an advancing soldier as he reaches for an AK-47 lying beside him. Cowering in the corner, you, in turn, are shot twice in the back. As shock sets in, you plead with the soldiers to kill you, to finish the job.

You are Omar Khadr. Your ordeal has barely begun.

Read the article here

At The Star today:

Lawyers for Guantanamo prisoner Omar Khadr have lost their bid to have his charges dismissed due to unlawful political influence.

The military judge presiding over the Canadian’s case ruled yesterday that senior Pentagon official Brig.-Gen. Thomas W. Hartmann did not improperly influence military prosecutors concerning Khadr’s case.

Hartmann’s conduct as a legal adviser for Guantanamo’s war crimes trials has come under intense scrutiny this year and two military judges presiding over cases of other detainees had already excluded him from the proceedings.

Read the rest here

Pathetic Excuse for a Sovereign Nation

If the US was trustworthy, perhaps this would be justified.  We know the US is not trustworthy.  From the Globe and Mail:

Senior Canadian intelligence officials warned against allowing Abousfian Abdelrazik, a Canadian citizen, to return home from Sudan because it could upset the Bush administration, classified documents reveal.

“Senior government of Canada officials should be mindful of the potential reaction of our U.S. counterparts to Abdelrazik’s return to Canada as he is on the U.S. no-fly list,” intelligence officials say in documents in the possession of The Globe and Mail.

“Continued co-operation between Canada and the U.S. in the matters of security is essential. We will need to continue to work closely on issues related to the Security of North America, including the case of Mr. Abdelrazik,” the document says.

Although heavily redacted, the documents illuminate a government keen to placate the Bush administration, irrespective of the guilt or innocence of Mr. Abdelrazik, who has lived in the lobby of the Canadian embassy in Khartoum for nearly three months.

[…]

The Abdelrazik documents – prepared by senior intelligence and security officials in Transport Canada, the unit that creates and maintains Canada’s own version of the terrorist “no-fly” list – make clear that it was the U.S. list that kept Mr. Abdelrazik from returning to Canada when he was released from prison three years ago.

That appears to contradict the explanation by former foreign minister Maxime Bernier who told the House of Commons that “Mr. Abdelrazik is currently not able to return to Canada on his own because he is on the United Nations’ list of suspected terrorists.”

Mr. Abdelrazik is on the UN’s so-called 1267 list – named for the resolution co-sponsored by Canada that created it – but the travel ban allows specific exemptions, including travel for medical reasons, to make the pilgrimage to Mecca and to return to the country of citizenship.

Mr. Abdelrazik was jailed in Sudan’s notorious Kober prison, where he says he was beaten and tortured. Previously obtained documents, marked “CSIS” – a reference to the Canadian Security Intelligence Service – say he was imprisoned “at our request” meaning at Canada’s request.

CSIS agents interrogated Mr. Abdelrazik with the co-operation of Sudan’s security services in December, 2003, while he was in Kober prison. Mr. Abdelrazik says he told Canadian diplomats he was being tortured in Kober, but they didn’t care.

The classified Transport Canada documents show the Bush administration labelled Mr. Abdelrazik a terrorist threat on July 20, 2007, the same day he was released by the Sudanese government, which said it could no longer imprison a man they deemed to be innocent.

He was also put on the Bush administration’s Transportation Security Administration’s “no-fly” blacklist at the same time.

Two days later, Lufthansa and Air Canada refused to allow Mr. Abdelrazik to fly home to Montreal from Khartoum via Frankfurt. That was before Canada had its own no-fly list and more than a year before the Bush administration succeeded in adding Mr. Abdelrazik’s name to the UN list of alleged al-Qaeda operatives.

Most international airlines are unwilling to risk sanctions by the Bush administration and refuse to carry anyone on the U.S. blacklist even if they are flying a route that doesn’t involve a U.S. stop or airspace.

Meanwhile, the Canadian government made it clear to Air Canada that even without its own list, it didn’t want the airline to allow Mr. Abdelrazik on its flights.

“If you should revisit your position on transporting Mr. Abdelrazik, the government of Canada would expect you to discuss arrangements for such travel with us,” the airline is warned in another government document, also marked secret.

The two senior officials whose names are attached to the secret document naming Mr. Abdelrazik as an “Islamic Extremist” – Isabelle Desmartis, director of security policy for Transport Canada, and Debra Normoyle, director-general of security and emergency preparedness at Transport Canada – did not return calls for comment.

“The words are defamatory,” Mr. Hameed said, referring to the “Islamic Extremist” label.

The description echoes that used by the RCMP to describe Maher Arar, who received an apology and was paid more than $10-million in compensation by Ottawa for its complicity in identifying him to U.S. counterterrorist agents, who then sent him to Syria where he was tortured.

In the final report of the Arar commission of inquiry, Mr. Justice Dennis O’Connor concluded “the RCMP had no basis for this description, which had the potential to create serious consequences for Mr. Arar in light of American attitudes.”

Mr. Abdelrazik denies any link with Islamic extremists groups or al-Qaeda.

He says he simply wants to return to his family in Montreal.

Foreign Affairs officials say in correspondence with Mr. Hameed that the Canadian government supports removing Mr. Abdelrazik from the UN blacklist of alleged al-Qaeda suspects, but the government declines to confirm that publicly.

Meanwhile, the government continues to refuse to issue Mr. Abdelrazik a new Canadian passport. His previous one expired while he was imprisoned and his Sudanese jailers returned it to the Canadian embassy.

Canadian diplomats say they would issue him emergency travel documents, but only if he had an airline ticket.

That is impossible as long as he remains on the U.S. no-fly list.

*****

‘Canadian eyes only’

Although he’s committed no crimes and there’s no known evidence linking him to dangerous activities or individuals, Canada refuses to allow Abousfian Abdelrazik to return from effective exile in Sudan to his home in Montreal. This document, dated April 30, 2008 and prepared by two Transport Canada security officials, shows the Canadian government was concerned about how the United States would react if Mr. Abdelrazik were allowed back into Canada.

*****

Transport Canada and other senior Government of Canada officials should be mindful of the potential reaction of our U.S. counterparts to Abdelrazik’s return to Canada as he is on the U.S. No-Fly List and the Department of Treasury’s Specially Designated Nationals and blocked Persons.

James Laxer

[…] the golden decades that came after 1945 have been followed by the age of reaction. The word “reaction” is used here as a counterpoint to “progress” or “progressive”, as in “reactionary.” It is not meant to convey the idea that this has been a period characterized by reactions against this or that, although there has been plenty of that as shall be seen.

During the age of reaction, it has been as though the film of the golden decades has been played backwards. Here is a telling example: in 2007, the relative income gap in the United States between rich and poor is wider than at any time since 1928 (the eve of the Great Depression.) The lives of ordinary people have grown more uncertain. During the past quarter century, most people have been on an economic treadmill, precariously attempting to make ends meet and to ward off the growing danger of crippling indebtedness. In all advanced countries, the gap between the rich and the rest of the population has widened.

The transformation has involved much more than economic outcomes. The idea of a society in which the marketplace is the central arena for determining priorities has pushed the notion of citizenship to the margin. Democracy, once thought to be advancing to include ever wider popular decision making, is in retreat. Political participation in elections is declining in almost all advanced countries. Plutocracy, the rule of society by the wealthy, is in the ascendancy.