When I began blogging nearly two months ago (seems longer), I was committed to focussing more on arts and literature (poetry) than politics and more on Canadian politics than US politics, just because the arts are closer to my heart and we can always use another Canadian blogger (I thought) to push back the sometimes overwhelming focus on Americana.
I knew that I would be focussing my political blogging on issues related to the US war in Iraq because the injustice of that war and of the many things that have flowed from it – illegal detainees at Guantanamo, the rendition of human beings to countries where they would be tortured, the illegal use of torture by the US when questioning their detainees, the detention of child soldiers, violence against women in its many forms, including against US mlitary personnel and private employees – it goes on.
And I have ended up with a focus on the war and all that flows from it. But I’ve also found myself unexpectedly caught up in the US election cycle. This is not because I think the election is, on its own, particularly important. I want a Democrat to win, because I think it makes a difference. I don’t care which Democrat wins because I don’t think it makes a difference. I would prefer that Americans (and the rest of us on lookers) could focus on more constructive issues and movements for change.
But this election has caught and held my attention. The Obama/Rev. Wright issue and racism, yes. But primarily the unprecedented unleashing of misogyny and sexism with respect to Sen. Clinton. There should be no one left within the purview of the American news machine who can honestly deny that this hateful outburst has cast a shadow on her campaign (though I have no doubt that some still do deny it). I’ve been saying for some time now that the pervasive air of misogyny has hurt not just Clinton, though it has absolutely without doubt changed the outcome of the campaign, but has hurt ALL women who live in this environment.
When the concept of sexual harrassment in the workplace was being developed, the idea of “cold climate” at work and “poisoned environment” came along to describe the way that sexual harrassment and inequality hurt not just its victims, but all women working in those environments. The North American ecosystem is poisoned in so many ways it’s difficult to calculate. Green house gases, global warming, pollution, destruction of natural resources, exploitative global capitalism, racism, yes, and now the terrible poison of sexism.
Of course, the sexism and misogyny was there before this US election and anyone who cared to know it could find many examples. But the Clinton candidacy has provided the “opportunity” for a virtual firestorm of hatred which many of us will not forget in our lifetimes. I am an older woman and have pretty much finished my time in the public/political sphere. I can’t imagine how I would feel if I were a younger woman looking to take my place in the world. This is a shocking state of affairs.
The only redeeming quality of the firestorm of misogyny to which we have been witness is the fact that it is all out in the open where, I hope, we can fight it. In order to fight it, we must name it. That has become important to me. I have posted many items relating to the misogyny that has been tarred and feathered all over Hillary Clinton. Others have done a more thorough job.
At Feminist Law Professors, Ann Bartow gives a taste of the best of the best, beginning with Erica Barnett‘s rundown of slurs against the Senator made by DEMOCRATS:
I’ve said it before-but because some Slog readers seem to still think I believe any attack on Clinton is a sexist attack, I’ll say it again: The misogyny from the media, from supposedly liberal blogger doodz, commenters on this blog, and just about everywhere during this campaign has been despicable. This kind of shit ought to be behind us: Hillary Clinton is a bitch. A big ol’ bitchy bitch. And a cunt. A “big fucking whore.” Fortunately, you can “call a woman anything.” She’s “Nurse Ratched.” She’ll castrate you if she gets a chance. She would like that. She’s a “She-Devil.” She’s a madam, and her daughter’s a whore. She’s frigid, and she can’t give head. She’s a “She-Devil.” A lesbian. A nag. When things get tough, she cries like a big dumb GIRL. In fact, she’s just that – a “little girl.” In FACT, she wants to “cry her way to the White House.” To be, ahem, “Crybaby-in-Chief.” That proves that she’s not tough enough. But she’s also not feminine enough. She’s “screechy.” She’s an “aging, resentful female.” She’s “Sister Frigidaire.” She really ought to quit running for President and stick to housework. She basically spent her entire times as First Lady going to tea parties. She’s a monster whojust won’t die. In fact, she really should just die. You can buy a urinal target with her face on it to express what you really think of her. OMG she’s got claws! She’s crazy. In fact, she’s a lunatic. She’s petty and vindictive and entitled. She’s a washed-up old hag. She’s “everbody’s first wife” standing outside probate court.” She’s a “scolding mother.” She’s shrill… shrill… shrill. She can’t take it when people are mean to her. She’s a “hellish housewife.” She’s Tanya Harding. She CAN’T be President, what with the mood swings and the menses.Any woman who votes for her is voting with her vagina, not her brain. Women only like Hillary because she’s a fellow Vagina-American. And because they vote with their feelings. Frankly, anyone who still thinks we need “feminine role models” should get over it and move on, already. Oh, and men who supporters are castratos in the eunuch chorus. You shouldn’t make her President because she wants it too much. She’s totally just banking on support from ugly old feminists. And she looooves to “play the victim.” She cackles! And cackles. And cackles. It’s like she’s a witch or something! She’s definitely“witchy.” And now you can buy her cackle as your ring tone. Her voice, too, is “grating”-like “fingernails on a blackboard” to “some men.” She’s hiding behind her gender. She isn’t a “convincing mom” because she’s too strident. She never did anything on her own. Her husband keeps her on a leash. She hates men. Her campaign is a “catfight.” She makes people want to kill themselves, is like a “domineering mother,” and is cold. And OMG she has boobies! All of which are reasons to hate her. (And boy, could I go on.)
Oh, and if you even mention any of this, you’re either silly or a bad person.
So yeah, while I’m ready to get on the Obama welcome wagon, I’m also angry. And I’m not ready to “get over” the blatant, ugly misogyny that so many Democrats-Democrats!-have displayed throughout this campaign, thank you very fucking much.
Yes and if Sen. Clinton mentions ANY of this, she is playing the victim, playing the gender card. Cheating? Being manipulative? Trying to get the “sympathy vote”? WHAT sympathy vote?
Ann Bartow points to the great post by Echidne about why all this is so important, outside the campaign itself. And also to Historiann, and to the likelihood that Michelle Obama has been and is likely to be the next candidate for this hateful vitriol, Bartow directs us to What About Our Daughters and on the role of supposedly Liberal Doodz, here
I’m a Canadian and for some reason, the US won’t let me vote in their election (though it likely affects me as much as it affects “them”). But I have said before and I say again, it is reprehensible that Barack Obama hasn’t spoken out on this ugly issue. A failure of leadership. And I couldn’t vote for him. Nor could I vote for John McCain. This issue is always cast aside as being not as important as the economy, the war, health care etc. It is. It is inextricably intertwined with those “more important” issues. Women, after all, represent a large portion of the economy, they are at war and their sons, brothers and husbands are at war, they are not only affected by the messed up health care system as are men, but they suffer in varying degrees from lack of access to birth control, abortion etc., and, they are the primary health care givers, pubicly or privately. It is perilous indeed to ignore the “national conversation” about “women’s place” that has taken place over the last months.