WTH is Up With Mallick?

If there’s one thing I really don’t want right now from a feminist, it’s a paean to the great, “MALE”,  police work of a balding OPP officer.  Was she feeling guilty for feeling negatively toward “men”?  Because I don’t feel guilty.  I don’t feel negatively toward men you see.  I feel negatively toward sexism and the cult of masculinity.  This saves me from having to tell fine and decent men that they are fine and decent when I’d rather be thinking about my dead sisters, how they got that way and how we’re ever going to stop it.  Sorry Heather.  I. Do. Not. Get. It.

“It is true that the Belleville and Ottawa police should have alerted women earlier that there was something evil on the loose, something Jessica Lloyd herself referred to as the “Tweed creeper.” Women were left helpless by their lack of knowledge. But the work of the police once they found a tire track and footprints in the snow outside Lloyd’s home was stellar.” 

What. The. Fuck?  So the police did great once it was absolutely clear who the killer was?  After his SUV was identified by three fine citizens who bothered to watch out for their neighbours?  After the police harassed and detained Larry Jones?  After countless women had their homes invaded and personal items stolen and were ignored?  After two sexual assaults weren’t linked?  After a murder wasn’t linked to the sexual assaults?  After Jessica Lloyd was dead? 

If competent police work was done after all that, thank the fucking goddess!  Are we not to expect competent police work?  Do we have to extend tenderness to cops who do their jobs? 

It’s been really hard sitting in that courtroom.  I know that.  But doesn’t Mallick have an editor to censor bathetic drivel?  Or a feminist friend?

Heather on how the “good guys” nailed Williams

This post was originally published as a Note on my Facebook page.  Go there for the discussion.  Be my friend.  As long as you’re not a fucking stalker.  In which case, there will be blood.  Metaphorically speaking.

Why We Should Pay Attention to the Colonel You-Know Story

1. Because we need to see and understand how impossible it is for the mainstream media in general to report these kinds of cases fairly, accurately and KNOWLEDGEABLY.  For instance, I keep hearing that his fetish for underwear escalated into break-ins, photo sessions whilst modelling the undies and masturbation on camera, leaving the evidence of such behind.  Now that is not a women’s underwear fetish.  Such fetishes are perfectly harmless.  This is the escalation of PREDATORY behaviour!  The point is not the underwear.  The point is that it belonged to a girl or woman who wore it and kept it in her dresser drawer.  To break into the house, the bedroom, the dresser drawer of a girl or woman, try on her underwear and spend hours taking pictures of yourself wearing it while masturbating isn’t a fetish, it’s a VIOLATION of the personal space and the sexualized belongings of the girl or woman.  To masturbate all over her bedroom is a VIOLATION.  To tie her up and take pictures of her while masturbating and taking pictures is a VIOLATION.  To do the same and then kill her is a VIOLATION.  This is escalating predatory behaviour, not fetishism.

2.  Because we need to know that if the cops were educated about such behaviour and able to categorize it properly and make predictions on the basis of that information, THEY MIGHT BE ABLE TO STOP PEOPLE LIKE COL. WHAT’S IT.  And ought to have caught him before he sexually assaulted four women or, at the very least, before he killed two of them. 

3. Because we need to know how easily predatory men get along in our misogynist culture and particularly in the most macho aspects of that culture which would certainly be THE MILITARY!  If I wanted to be a raping serial killer I would be in the military or I’d be a cop.    

I’ll probably be back to add more as the coverage causes a whole body rash. 

Read this at Broadsides

Watch this: Above Suspicion at the fifth estate

Antonia picked up on this and added more at Broadsides and this too.

This post was originally published as a Note on my Facebook page on October 20, 2010.  Go there if you want to see the comments and you are my “friend”.  If you’re not my friend, how come?

UPDATE:  An expanded version of this post appears at rabble The horrific Williams murders were about power not personal fetishes

Capital at Work?

Bill Moyers chats up Matt Taibbi and Robert Kuttner on why the Democrats can’t win.

First up is Bill himself:

Truth is, our capitol’s being looted, republicans are acting like the town rowdies, the sheriff is firing blanks, and powerful Democrats in Congress are in cahoots with the gang that’s pulling the heist. This is not capitalism at work. It’s capital. Raw money, mounds of it, buying politicians and policy as if they were futures on the hog market. 

Pretty prose but I’m just not sure about the distinction being made between capitalism and capital at work?

Now for Kuttner on the Dem’s health care bill:

… the deal going in was that the administration, drug companies, insurance companies are on the same team. Now, that’s one way to get legislation, it’s not a way to transform the health system. Once the White House made this deal with the insurance companies, the public option was never going to be anything more than a fig leaf. And over the summer and the fall, it got whittled down, whittled down, whittled down to almost nothing and now it’s really nothing. 

Isn’t that capitalism at work? 

Here’s Matt Taibbi:

I think, you know, a lot of what the Democrats are doing, they don’t make sense if you look at it from an objective point of view, but if you look at it as a business strategy- if you look at the Democratic Party as a business, and their job is basically to raise campaign funds and to stay in power, what they do makes a lot of sense.

What?  Taibbi’s a good investigative reporter but what gives him the creds to be a “political reporter” is beyond me.  Democratic policy makes no sense from an “objective point of view” but it’s good business strategy?  That’s not deeply explanatory.  The Dem’s policy makes good objective business sense.  That’s what Western political “democracy” has come to whether you are its object or subject and whatever that means.

Now back to Kuttner.  Moyers asks him if he’d vote for the bill and he says:

Well, it’s so far from what I think is necessary that I don’t think it’s a good bill. But I think if it goes down, just because of the optics of the situation and the way the Republicans have framed this as a make or break moment for President Obama, it will make it easier for the Republicans to take control of Congress in 2010. It will make Obama even more gun-shy about promoting reform. It will create even more political paralysis. It will embolden the republicans to block what this President is trying to do, some of which is good, at every turn. So I would hold my nose and vote for it. 

Isn’t this a deeply cynical and anti-democratic view of politics that plays right into the hands of regressives, as usual?  Isn’t that what’s wrong with the Dems?  It seems a deliberate choice on their part and it is an ideological one.  I don’t know why anyone would make the choice to vote for this bill after saying the Dems made deals with the devils of big pharma and health insurance companies from the get-go.  The acceptance of the system as-is here is depressing and familiar. 

As is the rest of the conversation.

I’ve been on a bit of a hiatus for the last six months.  Did the state of political analysis suffer some kind of influenza while I was gone?

A Wild Surprise for All My Beauties

Spring Song II

And now my spring beauties,
Things of the earth,
Beetles, shards and wings of moth
And snail houses left
From last summer’s wreck,
Now spring smoke
Of the burned dead leaves
And veils of the scent
Of some secret plant,

Come, my beauties, teach me,
Let me have your wild surprise,
Yes, and tell me on my knees
Of your new life.

A spring poem for Easter day by Jean Garrigue (1914-1972), anthologized in the Everyman’s Library Pocket Poets edition The Four Seasons, edited by J. D. McClatchy.

Tributes to Natasha

The lights will dim on Broadway tonight:

Sam Mendes helped break her out of perpetual typecasting as a posh English blonde when he surprised many by casting her as Sally Bowles in his Broadway revival of the musical Cabaret. The role won her a Tony award. “Natasha combined the best of Redgrave and Richardson: the enormous depth and emotional force of a great actor on the one hand, and the intelligence and objectivity of a great director on the other,” Mendes said. “She was one of a kind, a magnificent actress. She was also an amazing mother, a loyal friend, and the greatest and most generous host you could ever hope to meet.”

After shying away from roles made famous by her mother for many years, in 2003 she returned to the London stage to play the lead in Ibsen’s The Lady from the Sea, directed by Sir Trevor Nunn, at the Almeida theatre, where Michael Attenborough had just taken over as artistic director. Attenborough said: “Natasha was a beautiful human in every conceivable way; gracious of manner, witty and sharp of mind, sunny in disposition and stunning in appearance. She was completely her own woman, brave, determined and totally committed to her two major loves – her family and her work.”

Paul Schrader, who gave her the title role in his 1988 film Patty Hearst and two years later cast her again opposite Rupert Everett in The Comfort of Strangers, said: “Natasha Richardson was an extraordinary actress, not just for her beauty, lineage and talent, but for her intelligence and fearlessness. She was brave and smart. I was in awe of her from the time we first met and will miss her dearly.”

Nick Moore, the director on what proved to be her last film, Wild Child, called her “wonderfully generous and kind; a complete joy to be with.”

Praising her “classy and special” qualities, he added: “All the kids in the movie loved being around her. She pitched in and was great with them. She led by example.”

Lindsay Lohan, an unexpectedly successful pairing with Richardson in the 1998 film The Parent Trap, said: “She was a wonderful woman and actress, and treated me like I was her own. My heart goes out to her family.”

 

She had walked away from an apparently minor fall during a ski lesson with Micheal, 13, and Daniel, 12, on the learner slopes at the Canadian ski resort of Mont Tremblant.

However, within an hour she began to complain of a severe headache, and was transferred first to the local hospital, where she slipped into a coma, then to Sacre-Coeur in Montreal, and was finally flown on a life support machine to Lenox Hill hospital in New York, her husband by her side. Many tributes reflected a feeling that the best was yet to come.

The film director Michael Winner said: “She was a wonderful actress – the whole family is incredible – and she had not yet fulfilled her possibilities. It’s a twinkle and a sparkle that has left the world.”

Her father, the director Tony Richardson, died of Aids in 1991 and she was on the board of the US Foundation for Aids Research, where a spokeswoman said: “Our hearts go out to her family. This is a catastrophic loss for them … Natasha’s passion for the cause and timeless efforts gave hope and inspiration to the scientists and healthcare workers on the frontline of this deadly epidemic, as well as to the millions of people living with HIV/Aids around the world.”

Read the whole thing here

IggyCon

From James Laxer:

In this life, there are times when you have to make fundamental choices. You go one way or you go the other. The Liberal Party had such a choice to make: between the formation of a progressive coalition government with the NDP, or propping up the Harper government. The first choice would have allowed for the presentation of a budget to parliament that really would have offered hope to Canadians in a dark time.

[…]

In the face of this, Michael Ignatieff and the Liberals have made the second choice. They have decided to prop up the Harper government. If I had to speculate about the reason for this, I’d conclude that they are more comfortable with the Conservatives and the business community than they are with social democrats, trade unionists and wage and salary earners.

So be it. This is not a personal matter. Although the media is trying to make it seem that social democrats are miffed because they have been jilted by Ignatieff who is now dating the Prime Minister, it’s really about whose basic interests a party chooses to serve. The Liberals have made things very clear. That’s sad, not for Jack Layton and the NDP, but for Canadians who deserved better.

Read the whole thing here

And make sure you read Broadsides

Geigel Book

geigel1

Book Cover Design by Wilfredo Geigel

A full leather binding in blue Harmatan leather. The cover decoration consists of a blind tooled silhouette of a female figure representing Salammbo covered with a shawl that stretches across the front and back covers and is studded with gilded stars throughout. The inside of the covers are dressed with sunken doublures of deep blue Japanese paper. The end bands are sewn with three silk threads and the top edge is painted with blue water color paint. 8 X 6 inches.

From

Rick & Adolph

Rick Warren wants the members of his Church to give themselves to Jesus the same way the “brown shirts” gave themselves to Hitler.  And Russians to Lenin.  And the Chinese to Mao.  I would have thought that Jesus was looking for something a little different.  I’m quite sure he used different tactics than any of these authoritarian dictators.  Far as I know, Jesus never asked anyone to give up their brain or punished people who disagreed with him.

We are supposed to “forgive” Barack Obama for inviting Rick Warren to do the inaugural invocation prayer in the spirit of the “new bipartisan politics” he is presumably trying to invent.  What I’ve learned is that there’s nothing more dangerous to democracy than ignoring real problems and real, material conflicts of interest between people – dangerous to the “have-nots” that is, those who are less powerful economically, politically and socially.  I’m not advocating some kind of war against Rick Warren and it’s possible it might be worthwhile sitting down to talk to this fellow, if only to point out to him the dangers of his rhetoric.

I’m not entirely sure, though.  I wonder how much can be gained from chatting with a guy who wants his congregation to spread out and convert the people of the world to Christianity so that the end of the world can come – remember, not everyone goes to heaven with their glorious leader.  It’s not irrelevant what Rick Warren says.  What he says is downright scary.  It could just be that his followers are even scarier.

Remember the movie “Contact” with Jodi Foster, the scientist who makes contact with beings from another galaxy?  The photo the “aliens” choose to transmit to earth is Adolf Hitler “preaching” in Berlin.  I just hope that neither Rick Warren nor anyone like him becomes as famous as Adolf.

Thanks Barack.  I guess this will get you on the right side for The Rapture.

See this and this.

UPDATE:  The Pastor Rick story is actually worse than I thought, if that’s possible.  Here’s Bruce Wilson at AlterNet:

During his Anaheim stadium speech Warren, sometimes called ‘pastor Rick’ talked about a number of visions and communications he had received from God. By calling on his church members to follow Jesus with the fanatical dedication with which the Nazis, or Hitler Youth, gave to Adolf Hitler, Rick Warren appeared to  be in effect asking his Saddleback members to be fanatically dedicated to Warren’s own leadership, given his role in divining God’s intent for the Saddleback church flock. During his speech, Rick Warren also explained that God had personally instructed him to seek, for the good of the world, more influence,  power and fame.

Warren moved on, from his celebration of Nazi dedication to purpose, and held up Lenin, and Chinese Red Guard efforts during the Cultural Revolution, as behavioral examples for his Saddleback flock, whom Warren called on to carry out a “revolution”.

Concluding his motivational speech, the Saddleback Church founder instructed his ranks in the stadium to hold up signs, from their official programs, with the preprinted message “whatever it takes”. Warren then introduced, as leader of the first nation on Earth in which the P.E.A.C.E. Plan would be implemented, Rwandan President Paul Kagame.

In 1998 under Kagame’s leadership Rwanda, along with the now officially “Purpose Driven” nation of Uganda, invaded the Democratic Republic of The Congo, touching off a conflict that has claimed more civilian lives than any since World War Two. On December 12, 2008, the United Nations  accused Rwanda of aiding Congolese warlord Laurent Nkunda, accused of massacres and human rights violations and whose recent offensive has created several hundred thousand Congolese refugees. [this actually makes me sick.]

In March 2008, Rick Warren’s Saddleback launched an official national “Purpose Driven Living” program in Uganda, a country which was  indicted in 2005 by the International Criminal Court for perpetrating “massive” human rights violations by invading and looting the natural riches of the Congo. Uganda is known for brutalizing its own population too. In the late 1990’s under president Yowerie Museveni, whose wife Janet Museveni has spoken at Saddleback Church conferences, the Ugandan military drove upwards of two million Acholi tribe members in Northern Uganda, through a terror campaign of massacres and bombing, into crowded concentration camps on the Congo-Uganda border where many languish to this day, in what one Former Undersecretary for the UN has described as an ongoing, slow genocide.

Mega-pastor Warren, who will give the opening prayer at the inauguration of president-elect Barack Obama on January 20, 2009, aspires to great moral and spiritual leadership. Rick Warren has called for a second Christian Reformation, and he has stated his intent of inspiring ‘one billion’ Christians, half of all Christians globally, to become personally and ‘radically’ committed to changing the world.

With his impressive managerial skills and through his global network of four hundred thousand Christian pastors who have been trained by Saddleback over the last two decades, Rick Warren might well be able to start such a movement.

“Stop dreaming and start doing,” the “Purpose Driven Life” author told his Anaheim Stadium crowd. Warren described a global Christian movement to bring the message of Jesus Christ to every man, woman and child on Earth. “It’s going to cover the planet,” he proclaimed, “and then the end is going to come.”

Calling for “total mobilization of this church” and “radical devotion” to the cause, Pastor Warren sketched out his vision, which he declared was from God, of a “revolution”, launched through Warren’s “Purpose Driven” network of hundreds of thousands as pastors globally, to create a Christian world regime.

Though Warren’s speech was in the idiom of Christianity, he did not seek to inspire his Saddleback audience with examples of great religious leaders who have changed history through persuasion or other nonviolent approaches. Rick Warren looked to 20th century exemplars of vision and dedication but not to Mohatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, or any other religious leaders.

With more than a hint of admiration in his voice, pastor Warren described how in 1939 in a packed Munich Stadium before the leader of the Third Reich, young brown-shirted men and women spelled out in formation, with their bodies, words in German which read “Hitler, we are yours.”

“And they nearly took the world, ” pastor Rick told the stadium crowd. He moved on to quote another inspirational example from the 20th Century, Lenin, who said ‘give me 100 committed, totally committed men and I’ll change the world.’ Once again Warren observed, “They nearly did.”

Having cited dedication and zeal of young Nazis and the efficacy of Bolshevik Revolutionaries, Warren moved on to describe how the sayings of Chairman Mao, printed up in the “Little Red Book”, had helped propel the revolutionary fervor of the Chinese Red Guard who had carried out the violent, anarchic revolutionary spasm known as the Cultural Revolution.

With those examples fresh in his audiences mind, Rick Warren instructed the crowd of his thirty thousand to hold up pre-printed signs, within their programs, white letters against a red background, that said  “Whatever it takes.”

Looking out at the crowd Warren enthused, “I’m looking at a stadium full of people who are saying, ‘whatever it takes, God’.

Initially, the “P” in Rick Warren’s P.E.A.C.E. plan stood for “planting churches”. In a later iteration the “P” was recast as standing for “promoting reconciliation”. But as Warren’s one-hour talk currently on his official P.E.A.C.E. Plan website makes quite clear, the plan is primarily about evangelizing the world and multiplying Christian leadership to help carry that out. Compared to the need to save souls, alleviating human suffering is secondary.

As described in a January 7th, 2008 Daily Beast article by journalist Max Blumenthal, the reputation of Rick and Kay Warren, for work on HIV/AIDS reduction, appears considerably overrated. As Blumenthal writes, “a survey of Warren’s involvement in Africa  reveals a web of alliances with draconian right-wing clergymen who have sidelined science-based approaches to combating in favor of abstinence-only education. Most disturbingly, Warren’s allies have rolled back key elements of the continent’s most successful initiative, the so-called ABC program in Uganda. Their activism, according to Stephen Lewis, the United Nations’ special envoy for HIV/AIDS in Africa, is ‘resulting in great damage and undoubtedly will cause significant numbers of infections which never should have occurred.’ ”  [emphasis mine]

As Blumenthal’s article goes on to explore, one of Rick Warren’s allies in Uganda, Martin Ssempa, has played a key role in reducing the availability of condoms in Uganda. Known for publicly burning a pack of condoms at Uganda’s Makerere University, Ssempa advises Ugandan First Lady Janet Museveni on HIV/AIDS policy and has successfully lobbied the US Congress to de-fund Population Resources International, a world distributor of condoms. As abstinence-only has ramped up and condom availability decreased in Uganda, the HIV/AIDS rate has begun to climb.

Martin Ssempa has delivered two speeches, and also led workshops, at Rick and Kay Warren’s HIV/AIDS conferences. As public health expert Dr. Helen Epstein described, in an excerpt from a recent book of hers published in the New York Review of Books, Martin Ssempa told her that ‘Satan worshipers under Lake Victoria’ make deals with the devil to stage car accidents and kidnappings in exchange for cash.  [emphasis mine]

Ssempa, a charismatic pastor, runs a church which performs regular exorcisms. Pastor Ssempa is also highly active in antigay activism in Uganda, where homosexuality is illegal, and has publicized names of accused homosexuals who have subsequently gone into hiding.  [emphasis mine]

Media coverage has tended to emphasize the component of the P.E.A.C.E. Plan in which Christians would work to alleviate diseases, such as HIV/AIDS, and address poverty and illiteracy. But the two top problems, according to Rick Warren, have nothing to do with human material or physical needs. The top problem, according to Warren, is “spiritual emptiness”.

As Warren explained to a Dallas gathering of 12,000 Baptists, charismatic and nondenominational evangelicals in May of 2005, “spiritual emptiness” is an acute disorder characterized by aimlessness, fear and lack of purpose, afflicting non-Christians, that arises in the absence of a personal relationship with Jesus; “Billions of people live without Jesus Christ. Billions of people don’t know God has a purpose for their life,” Warren told his Dallas audience. “Egocentric leadership”, the second greatest cause of world problems according to Rick Warren, is due to  a lack of ‘servant leaders’ who model their behavior after Jesus.

Having defined the paramount world problems as, in essence, the fact that  evangelicalism has not fully converted everyone on Earth into Christians,  Rick Warren’s P.E.A.C.E. plan squarely addresses that dire need — for the Christian belief system to envelope the globe.

During his Anaheim speech, Warren revealed that he’d received a message from God to seek more influence, power and fame. God, Warren narrated, led him to Psalm 72, “Solomon’s prayer for more influence… in Psalm 72 [Solomon] says ‘God, I want you to make me more influential. God, I want you to give me more power. I want you to bless my life more. God, I want you to spread the fame of my name through other countries.’ ”  [Well, Obama has certainly helped out with this.]

“It sounded pretty selfish,” mused Warren but, as he explained to the crowd, God had led him on a path towards solving the five biggest global problems.  

Beyond ‘spiritual poverty’, egocentric leadership is the next most oppressive ‘global giant’, according to Rick Warren, and thus a higher priority than HIV/AIDS, poverty, and other material afflictions. “The world is full of little Saddams,” he observed, “they’re in every country, they’re in every church, they’re in every business, they’re in every homeowner’s association. They’re everywhere. You give a guy a little power and it goes to his head.

 

It’s been suggested that hanging out with Warren might encourage better dialogue between Christian fundamentalists and the rest of us – you know, just because we disagree we don’t have to be disagreeable.  As I originally feared, it might be a better idea to put Warren some place where he can’t do any harm. 

Message to Barack:  another thing Warren said in his sermon was this –

Moderate people get moderately nothing done.

Oops.